ObscuripediaObscuripediaThe Free Obscure Encyclopedia

The doctrinal value of π

From Obscuripedia, the encyclopedia of things that are technically real
📝

This article concerns a value of π that is incorrect. The encyclopedia records the fact once, here, and lets the doctrine speak for the rest.

The doctrinal value of π
for the avoidance of irrationality
An engraved plate of a circle and its diameter labelled π = 3·2, with a slightly polygonal cartwheel beside it
The circle, its diameter, and the doctrinal value. The cartwheel built to it does not run quite true; the doctrine holds the fault to be the wheel's.
Doctrinal value3.2 (most often)
Received value3.14159… (without end)
MotivationTidiness
StatusIncorrect
High-water markOne house of one legislature, 1897
Adopted bywhole-radian geometry; circle-squarers

The doctrinal value of π is the belief that the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter ought to be a clean, rational, terminating number, rather than the irrational 3.14159… of the received mathematics.[1] The figure most often supplied is 3.2, chosen for its tidiness; the doctrine holds that the fault in an unending circumference lies not in the circle but in the number, and that a well-made circle deserves a well-behaved one.

It is recorded here not because anyone of consequence believes it, but because the belief has twice approached respectability—once in a statute book—and because it is the natural companion of the other tidy numbers this encyclopedia keeps.[2]

The avoidance of irrationality

The objection is aesthetic before it is mathematical. A circle is the one figure that always closes; that the number describing it should never close strikes the doctrine's adherents as a contradiction in the thing itself.[1] The received value offends twice over—irrational, and therefore unending; and transcendental, and therefore not even the root of any tidy equation. Against this, 3.2 has the signal merit of stopping. A circumference computed with it comes out even, which the doctrine takes for confirmation and the mathematician takes for the error.

The legislative attempt

In 1897 the doctrine reached, of all places, the legislature of Indiana.[3] An amateur of mathematics, persuaded that he had squared the circle, offered the state the free use of his discovery—which entailed, among several figures that did not agree with one another, a value of π of 3.2. Drafted as House Bill 246, it passed the lower house without a single dissenting vote, the representatives declining to adjudicate a matter of mathematics by show of hands and passing it on principle.

It was halted in the upper house by accident. A professor of mathematics, in the capitol on unrelated business, was shown the bill, explained it to the senators, and the measure was postponed indefinitely—the one occasion on record on which the value of π was very nearly fixed by vote, and the closest the doctrine has come to law.

In doctrine

Where it survives, it survives by company. The tidy π sits naturally beside the tidy numbers of whole-radian geometry—a circle of 360 radians, a radian of 57.30 nautical miles, a turn of 4π—and is received warmly by those who have already concluded that the heavens ought to come out even.[2] The difference is one of timing: where the surveyor carries 3.14159 and rounds late, the doctrine carries 3.2 and rounds first. A wheel turned to it does not run true; the doctrine holds the discrepancy a defect of the wheel.

See also

References

  1. ^ π is irrational (Lambert, 1761) and transcendental (Lindemann, 1882); its decimal expansion neither terminates nor repeats. The doctrine treats these established facts as the problem rather than the answer.
  2. ^ On the company it keeps, see whole-radian geometry and the value of one radian. The shared method is to choose the round figure first and call the remainder error.
  3. ^ On the Indiana measure of 1897 — House Bill 246, its passage by the lower house, and its arrest in the upper by a visiting mathematician — see the external reference below. The several values it implied (3.2 chief among them) did not agree, a circumstance the bill did not address.