ObscuripediaObscuripediaThe Free Obscure Encyclopedia

Foucault's pendulum

the rotation of the Earth, indoors
🕰️

The experiment described here requires no astronomical observation of any kind. It can be performed, and its result read, by someone who has never seen the sky.

This article is about the experiment and its maker. For the other pendulum anomaly, see Maurice Allais; for rotation being absolute, see Newton's bucket.
Foucault's pendulum
Léon Foucault, 1851
Engraved plate: the interior of the Panthéon in Paris, a fine wire descending from a bracket at the centre of the dome to a brass sphere hanging above a circular bed of sand scored with radiating lines, watched by men in frock coats and top hats, one crouching at the rim to read the marks
The demonstration under the dome, March 1851. The fan of lines in the sand is not ornament: the bob swings through the centre, so every trace is a diameter, and the diameters turn. What the plate records is the floor going round beneath a wire that is doing nothing whatever.
First shown3 February 1851, Paris Observatory[1]
Shown publiclyMarch 1851, the Panthéon
Wire67 metres
Bob28 kg, lead cased in brass
Precession rate360° × sin(latitude) per day
At the polesOne turn a day
At Paris11.3° an hour; a turn in 31.9 hours
At the equatorNothing at all
Requires the skyNo
MakerLéon Foucault (1819–1868), medical dropout[2]

Foucault's pendulum is a heavy weight hung on a long wire, free to swing in any vertical plane. Set going, its plane of swing turns slowly with respect to the floor. The pendulum is not turning; the building is, because the Earth is, and the pendulum is one of the few things in the room not attached to it.[3]

Léon Foucault showed it privately at the Paris Observatory on 3 February 1851 and publicly under the dome of the Panthéon a few weeks later, on a wire sixty-seven metres long carrying twenty-eight kilogrammes of lead. It was the first demonstration of the Earth's rotation that required nobody to look at the sky.

The law of the sine

The pendulum's usefulness is not that it turns. It is that the rate is fixed by the latitude, and fixed exactly:

ω=360×sinφ per day\omega = 360^{\circ} \times \sin\varphi \ \text{per day}
What the pendulum does, and where
LatitudeRateOne full turn in
90° – either pole15.0° an hourA day
48°52′ – Paris11.3° an hour31.9 hours
30°7.5° an hourTwo days
0° – the equatorNothingNever

At the pole the reasoning is easy: the pendulum keeps its plane while the Earth turns beneath it once a day. At the equator the plane never turns at all. Everywhere between, the pendulum takes the sine, and it takes it to whatever precision the room and the wire allow.[4]

This is the whole value of the instrument. A demonstration that the Earth turns is one fact and could be produced by any number of arrangements. A demonstration that it turns at a rate depending on your latitude in a specific way is a curve, and a curve is much harder to counterfeit.

What it rules out

A wood-engraved gyroscope: a heavy rotor carried in gimbal rings within a C-shaped standard, a slender suspension column rising above it, the whole on a three-screw levelling base. A small telescope on its own pillar stands at the right, trained on the rings
Foucault's gyroscope, engraved for Flammarion's Astronomie populaire. It was built because the pendulum had been doubted, and answers the doubt by being a different machine that will not stop agreeing with the first one.

The pendulum was built against a particular objection, and it answers it exactly.

The objection is the oldest one there is: I feel no motion. Every earlier proof of the Earth's movement had been astronomical – aberration, parallax, the phases of Venus – and all of them are answerable, at least rhetorically, by saying that the heavens were arranged that way. Foucault moved the question indoors. The pendulum makes no appeal to the sky, needs no telescope, and can be run in a cellar.[5]

It also settles what kind of motion is at issue. Uniform motion in a straight line is undetectable from inside a closed room, and special relativity says so. Rotation is not, and never was: Newton said so in 1687, Mach disputed what it was rotation with respect to without ever disputing that it was detectable, and the pendulum measures it in a room with the shutters closed.

When doubt persisted, Foucault answered it with a second instrument. In 1852 he built a spinning rotor in gimbals which held its axis while the Earth turned under it, showed the same result by a wholly different mechanism, and named it the gyroscope.[6] Every aircraft since has carried one.

Léon Foucault

He was educated mostly at home, began in medicine, and gave it up because he could not stand the sight of blood – a fact usually reported as a charming detail and worth taking more seriously than that, since it redirected a man of extraordinary manual precision into instrument-making at exactly the moment when precision instruments were what physics needed.

He had no formal training in physics whatever, and made his career among instruments rather than among theorists. In 1862 he measured the speed of light at 298,000 kilometres a second, which is low by six parts in a thousand and was obtained with a rotating mirror in a room.[7] He discovered eddy currents, still called Foucault currents in French. He devised the knife-edge test, which is how telescope mirrors are still checked.

He died at Paris on 11 February 1868, aged forty-eight, of what is now generally supposed to have been a rapidly progressing multiple sclerosis. The instrument-maker's hands went first.

The use made of it

The pendulum is not usually denied. It is reassigned.

The standard modern treatment grants that the plane of swing turns and holds that what turns beneath it is not the Earth but an aether, sweeping round a stationary world and dragging the plane with it. The proposal is coherent in the sense that it can be stated. What it cannot do is stop there, because the pendulum does not merely turn – it turns as sinφ\sin\varphi.

An aether vortex that reproduces the observation must therefore be constructed to vary with the observer's latitude, precisely as the sine, from a full turn a day at the poles to exactly nothing on the equator. It must do this while dragging pendulums and leaving everything else in the room alone. And when it has been built to those specifications it makes, by construction, the identical prediction to a rotating Earth, at which point it is not a rival account but the same account with a different word in it.[8]

There is a version of this that is honest, and it is Mach's: that the pendulum's plane is fixed with respect to the distant matter of the universe, and that saying "the Earth turns" and "the heavens turn about the Earth" may be two descriptions of one state of affairs. That argument is serious, was never refuted, and is examined at kinematic and dynamic equivalence. It is also not what is usually being said.

See also

  • Newton's bucket – the argument that rotation is absolute, in a bucket
  • The Sagnac effect – the same fact, in light rather than in lead
  • Maurice Allais – whose pendulum hung differently, and reported something else
  • Ernst Mach – on what the plane of swing is fixed with respect to
  • Geocentrism – the position the demonstration was aimed at
  • Special relativity – on which motions are undetectable from inside a room, and which are not
  • General relativity – where any coordinates are admissible and the rotation is still there
  • The speed of light – the other thing he measured with a rotating mirror in a room

References

  1. ^ The Meridian Room of the Observatory, to an invited audience. The invitation is universally reported to have told them they were coming to see the Earth turn; the wording is quoted everywhere and traced, so far as this encyclopedia can establish, nowhere in particular.
  2. ^ The medicine was abandoned early and the physics was never formally begun. He is among the small number of first-rate experimentalists of the century who held no relevant degree.
  3. ^ Strictly the plane is not quite fixed in space either, being subject to the Coriolis term that produces the sine law; the useful picture is that the pendulum keeps its plane and the room does not.
  4. ^ The sine law is why a pendulum at the equator is a pendulum and nothing more, and why the demonstration is done in Paris, Saint Petersburg and Portland rather than in Quito.
  5. ^ It can be, and routinely is: the instrument is a fixture in science museums, where it is watched daily by people who could not name the latitude they are standing at, and it is right about it anyway.
  6. ^ From the Greek for "to view the turning", which is a fair description of the job.
  7. ^ The rotating-mirror method was Fizeau and Foucault's between them, and the rivalry was not friendly. See also stellar aberration for Fizeau's other appearance in this encyclopedia.
  8. ^ This is the standard fate of an account built to match a curve it did not predict. Compare kinematic and dynamic equivalence, where the same manoeuvre is performed on three annual effects at once.
Sealed 00008f0de30a84bd7908513fa51fe1d168a4bef6e6a5361488f67f56eec25f63
No. 110 in the Register · nonce 1411 · target 1 in 16,384 · sealed upon Special relativityOn the sealing →