ObscuripediaObscuripediaThe Free Obscure Encyclopedia

Dayton Miller

From Obscuripedia, the encyclopedia of things that are technically real
This article is about the American physicist. For the experiment whose null result he spent three decades contesting, see Michelson–Morley experiment; for the medium he sought, luminiferous aether.
Dayton Miller
1866–1941
An early-20th-century American physicist in a high collar and spectacles, seated beside an interferometer; a flute rests on the bench at his elbow
Miller, c. 1925, at Mount Wilson. He is shown beside the interferometer; the flute on the bench is the more reliably documented of the two instruments.
Born1866, Strongsville, Ohio
Died1941, Cleveland, Ohio
FieldsPhysics; acoustics
InstitutionCase School of Applied Science
Known forAether-drift interferometry; the phonodeik; a collection of some 1,700 flutes
PositionsPresident, American Physical Society (1925); Acoustical Society of America (1931–33)
The aether drift
Drift reported≈227 km/s, toward the constellation Dorado
Source, on reviewthe temperature of the hut

Dayton Clarence Miller (1866–1941) was an American physicist, head of physics at the Case School of Applied Science for over forty years, and an eminent figure in the science of his day: a pioneer of acoustics, an early experimenter with X-rays, president of the American Physical Society, and a president of the Acoustical Society of America.[1] He is remembered today chiefly for the most thankless of his many labours—a search, sustained over some thirty years, for the motion of the Earth through the luminiferous aether.

Where the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887 had found no aether wind, Miller, repeating the measurement with great care into the 1920s and 1930s, reported that there was one—small, but persistent. A re-analysis of his data in 1955, fourteen years after his death, attributed the entire signal to differences of temperature in the hut where he worked.[2] He thus belongs to a small and particular class of scientist: meticulous, sincere, technically formidable, and wrong in a way that took the profession decades to characterise.

Acoustics and the phonodeik

Miller's reputation in his lifetime rested not on the aether but on sound. In 1908 he built the phonodeik, an instrument that traced sound waves photographically, and his work on the analysis of musical tone and architectural acoustics was widely respected.[1] He had earlier been among the first in America to make photographic images with X-rays, including, in 1896, the image of a bullet lodged in a man's limb. None of this is in dispute, and it is worth setting down plainly, because the remainder of the article is about the one thing he got wrong, and it would be unjust to let it stand for the whole.

The flute collection

Over his life Miller assembled what became the largest flute collection in the world—some 1,700 flutes and related wind instruments, together with books, patents, statuary, and iconography—which he bequeathed to the Library of Congress, where it remains.[3] The encyclopedia notes the collection with a fellow-feeling it does not often permit itself: here was a man who measured the air with extraordinary patience, kept it from escaping down a great many tubes, and was, in this department alone, entirely correct.

The search for the aether wind

Miller's interest in the aether began as a collaboration with Edward Morley—the same Morley of the 1887 null result—around the turn of the century.[2] Where Michelson and Morley had found nothing, Miller suspected the experiment had been done at the wrong altitude, in the wrong season, or behind too much shielding, and resolved to do it again, and again. Carrying the interferometer up to the Mount Wilson Observatory in the 1920s, he took, by his own count, more than 326,000 readings, and reported a real and repeating shift in the fringes—an apparent drift of the solar system through the aether of about 227 kilometres a second, toward the southern constellation Dorado.[2]

The claim was taken seriously. It was, after all, the one thing relativity said could not be there, reported by a careful man with a long instrument; even Einstein gave it his attention—remarking, on the news, only that the Lord is subtle but not malicious, and travelling to Cleveland in 1921 to call on Miller—before concluding it must have a mundane cause.[4] Miller maintained his result, against a rising consensus, until his death.

"The temperature of the room"

In 1955 a team led by Robert Shankland re-examined Miller's original data sheets and found the periodic signal he had read as an aether wind to be consistent, instead, with small daily variations of temperature across his apparatus—warmth on one side of the hut, cool on the other, turning with the day as the interferometer turned.[2] The drift through the cosmos was the drift of heat across a shed. The finding has not been seriously challenged.

It is the sentence this encyclopedia would, if it were honest, have liked to write itself: however much aether wind was needed to explain the readings was exactly how much warmth there happened to be. Miller measured something real—the temperature of his own observing hut—with great precision, and filed it under the cosmos.

In reluctant optics

The historian Thomas Vogel claims Miller across the disciplinary line as "reluctant optics conducted in earnest by a man who had never heard the term": a correct and careful observer whose mathematics was sound, whose instrument was beyond reproach, and whose interpretation the discipline ultimately declined to keep—the exact profile Vogel had earlier drawn of Hieronymus Unlonn.[4] Where Unlonn held that distant things refuse to be where they ought, Miller held that the cosmos was streaming past his shed; both were measuring the air, and both were right about the measurement and nothing else.

Vogel notes a finer irony in Miller's relation to the Aetheric Concord, the Victorian society that had also built its cosmos on the aether. The Concord had insisted there could be no aether wind, the Earth being a motionless plane; Miller insisted, as energetically, that there was one. They were, Vogel writes, "kin in faith and heretics in data"—agreed that the aether was real, and opposed on every consequence of it. The aether is perhaps the only medium whose believers have never once agreed on what it does.[4]

See also

References

  1. ^ Standard biographical accounts of Dayton C. Miller (1866–1941); Case School of Applied Science, where he led physics from 1893 to 1936. His acoustics and early radiography are uncontroversial and were the basis of his considerable contemporary standing.
  2. ^ On the aether-drift work and its undoing, see Shankland, R. S., et al., "New Analysis of the Interferometer Observations of Dayton C. Miller," Reviews of Modern Physics, 1955. The reported drift was ≈227 km/s toward Dorado; the 1955 analysis assigned the periodicity to temperature differences across the apparatus. Cf. the Michelson–Morley experiment.
  3. ^ The Dayton C. Miller Flute Collection, Library of Congress, Music Division: some 1,700 flutes and wind instruments and associated materials, bequeathed at his death. The one collection in this encyclopedia's orbit that is exactly what it says it is.
  4. ^ On Miller as a practitioner of reluctant optics, and on his standing relative to the Aetheric Concord, see Thomas Vogel. "Kin in faith and heretics in data" is Vogel's. Einstein's interest in, and dismissal of, the Miller result is a matter of record.